Discussion about this post

User's avatar
CJ Boris's avatar

I’ve listened to many of his talks and what you imply here, that he gets “chatty” is the demonic is a false characterization and quite uncharitable. I think you are right to caution readers against an interest in the demonic, but Fr. Ripperger’s interactions adhere to the guidelines that you yourself laid out about the old right. The new right exorcism is rarely used because it is not as effective of a tool, what you mistake for chattiness is his excellent memory and the sheer volume of exorcism experience. I think it is fair to warn readers against his talks because most don’t need access to this level of information and as you have said the demons lie, but I think impugning his character is unnecessary and uncharitable.

sTRADaestefano's avatar

I cannot agree with your article.

Your caution against needless discourse with demons is prudent; they are father of lies, and curiosity readily courts peril. Yet you overreach sharply. To brand a seasoned exorcist “disobedient” and a “mouthpiece of the diabolical” for drawing pastoral lessons from his ministry exceeds the rites’ actual bounds, which have long permitted necessary interrogation for deliverance. Father Ripperger’s public remarks may lean sensational, but they fall short of forbidden divination. Your summons to abandon him altogether lacks the measured discernment tradition demands and veers toward hysteria. In spiritual warfare, vigilance is essential yet Christ, not the enemy, must ever remain the center.

434 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?